Blog Feeds
07-07 08:10 PM
Immigration Law from Houston Immigration Lawyer - Annie Banerjee Has Just Posted the Following:
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
The justice Department's suit to block the restrictive law in Arizona is heralded by everyone as an "immigration issue." Both Wall Street Journal and New York Times have huge headings under "Immigration Law." But the question is not about immigration law. It is about the fundamental human right to not be judged by the color of our skin.
The proponents of the bill, like Arizona state Sen. Russell Pearce say that the bill "prohibits racial profiling." But I wonder if every individual is stopped and asked for their passports. The will cripple business in the State. Will everyone, ie white, black, brown, yellow, and whatever other color or look need to take their passports, birth certificates, etc to Arizona?
I naturalized into this country and is in the highest tax bracket. I work and pay taxes. Yet I am brown and have an accent. As a practitioner of immigration law, I know say for instance white Canadian who are here, in the US, working illegally, but are white and except for a slight "oot and aboot" has no other accent. Who will the Arizona police "catch"?
The lawsuit is also about separate state and federal rights. The Conservative Supreme Court will champion State rights, but it will remain to be seen whether they champion Separation of Powers. My guess is that their judgment will be clouded by the more emotional issue of immigration.
For more information contact Houston Immigration Lawyer (http://www.visatous.com) or Houston Immigration Attorney (http://www.visatous.com), Annie Banerjeehttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8629098317507537197-8318558763551200610?l=usimmigrationmatters.blogspo t.com
More... (http://usimmigrationmatters.blogspot.com/2010/07/arizona-and-justice-department-on.html)
wallpaper house Nicki Minaj before and
maheshf
08-15 04:53 PM
Thanks..my understanding was..i am not Abondoning H! unless i use EAD for my new employment.
Not sure though. I will be working for new emplyer not the one that applied for GC.
Not sure though. I will be working for new emplyer not the one that applied for GC.
sammyb
10-05 04:36 PM
http://cartoonbox.slate.com/hottopic/?image=5&topicid=86
direct image URL:
http://content.cartoonbox.slate.com/?feature=af87d0df42e7e12e4a0a07ae5bb5c468
thats a good one ..
shows the true state of affairs in legal immi front ...
direct image URL:
http://content.cartoonbox.slate.com/?feature=af87d0df42e7e12e4a0a07ae5bb5c468
thats a good one ..
shows the true state of affairs in legal immi front ...
2011 2011 2010 nicki minaj booty
arihant
07-18 03:28 PM
If this has happened to you personally then you may be able to let Ombudsman know about it.
if it has happened to a friend of yours then maybe you can convince the friend to complain to Ombudsman.
Beyond this I doubt there is much that can be done.
if it has happened to a friend of yours then maybe you can convince the friend to complain to Ombudsman.
Beyond this I doubt there is much that can be done.
more...
saurav_4096
07-24 10:15 PM
As long as they have valid visa, there should not be any problem entering after short gap outside USA.
I guess IO can object if this happens very frequently but in that case they will warn first rather than taking other action.
I guess IO can object if this happens very frequently but in that case they will warn first rather than taking other action.
rajenk
07-30 12:50 PM
What happens when old I-140 is cancelled by prior sponsor. Should the beneficiary still be eligibile to port his/her priority date based on the old approved I-140 (which is now cancelled ) ?
Still the PD is yours to keep. The only time I-140 will get invalidated even for PD porting is when USCIS found fraud in that filing.
Still the PD is yours to keep. The only time I-140 will get invalidated even for PD porting is when USCIS found fraud in that filing.
more...
sreenivas11
08-28 09:33 AM
Hi pd04
when did your checks encashed?
when did your checks encashed?
2010 images nicki minaj booty
leo2606
08-04 09:26 PM
^ Bump
more...
BEC_fog
12-10 12:14 PM
If it has been more then a few months or NEVER, please update the LUD for your contributions to IV also.....
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15905
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=15905
hair nicki minaj fake ooty before
p_kumar
01-03 03:27 PM
Today i called USCIS and opened my mouth to ask the IO (a nice sounding lady) about my I-485 status. Before i could say anything, she said if my application was received after April,2007, then she cannot tell anything as they are not processing cases filed after yet. She specifically said she cannot tell anything about Namecheck.
I politely thanked her and hung up. I think they stopped telling after everybody and his/her second cousin started calling. Is there any other way?.
thanks
I politely thanked her and hung up. I think they stopped telling after everybody and his/her second cousin started calling. Is there any other way?.
thanks
more...
glus
03-03 09:30 AM
Extension = from the time requested = for example 4/1/2008 to...no more than 3 years. 3 years is the max time requested. So, if you company requests from 4/1/2008, it should state until 4/1/2011.
Regards,
Regards,
hot nicki minaj booty before and
ronhira
10-07 03:18 PM
btw don't shoot me..... i'm just a messenger..... here is more information
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum5-all-other-green-card-issues/1606679-are-eb2-indians-losers-and-eb3-indians-locusts.html
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum5-all-other-green-card-issues/1606679-are-eb2-indians-losers-and-eb3-indians-locusts.html
more...
house hot hair Nicki Minaj Booty,
theshiningsun
05-29 04:49 AM
hi attorneys,
i hv an approved PERM & I-140. my company lawyer is not sharing the approvals with me. all i hv is a copy of the I-140 approval with the rcpt no. blanked out (however it shows the A-number). i do not hv a copy of the PERM approval or details of the job description used to file PERM.
i am planning to request USCIS for these documents by filing FOIA request. for this, i hv filled up form G-639 from the USCIS website.
my questions:
(1) are these 2 documents (approval for PERM & I-140) sufficient for me to retain my pd and/or use AC-21 in future? if not, then what r the other documents that i would need?
(2) does the PERM approval hv the job description reqd for AC-21?
(3) would i need copies of the petitions / forms filed or only the approvals would suffice?
(4) what is the approx time frame & cost in getting these documents using the FOIA process?
pls guide me. thx in advance,
i hv an approved PERM & I-140. my company lawyer is not sharing the approvals with me. all i hv is a copy of the I-140 approval with the rcpt no. blanked out (however it shows the A-number). i do not hv a copy of the PERM approval or details of the job description used to file PERM.
i am planning to request USCIS for these documents by filing FOIA request. for this, i hv filled up form G-639 from the USCIS website.
my questions:
(1) are these 2 documents (approval for PERM & I-140) sufficient for me to retain my pd and/or use AC-21 in future? if not, then what r the other documents that i would need?
(2) does the PERM approval hv the job description reqd for AC-21?
(3) would i need copies of the petitions / forms filed or only the approvals would suffice?
(4) what is the approx time frame & cost in getting these documents using the FOIA process?
pls guide me. thx in advance,
tattoo Nicki Minaj Booty Before and
JobSeekerInUSonL2withEAD
12-14 06:50 PM
In my job search (banking and finance jobs) there is this one question i come across on each and every job application-
"Do you now or will you in the future require sponsorship to legally work in the united states?"
and options to tick on the form are 'yes' or 'no' with no space for explanation.
So i mark 'yes' and i guess thats where my job applications get stuck.
Should I answer yes or no, since i am on L2 (visa valid for next 2 years) and currently have 2 years Employment Authorisation (EAD) where i can work for any employer in the United States ?
I understand that companies ask this question because some of them are not allowed/ do not have a policy to sponsor visas.
I want to know whether i am legally required to say 'yes' beacuse i am on L2 ( since after 2 years, my visa renewal depends on whether or not my spouse's L1 is renewed)
OR
Do I still have a choice to say 'no' since my visa renewal gets done if my husband's gets done or i manage it on my own through a consultant... and the company i will join in both cases does not have to sponsor or pay for my visa either now or in the future.
I do not want to misrepresent any information and get thrown out of the organisation after i join, nor do I want to lose out on opportunities because of answering this question wrongly.
(There is a separate question that asks if i am legally allowed to work in the US and i answer 'yes' to that since i have an EAD)
Let me know please, it'll help a lot.
"Do you now or will you in the future require sponsorship to legally work in the united states?"
and options to tick on the form are 'yes' or 'no' with no space for explanation.
So i mark 'yes' and i guess thats where my job applications get stuck.
Should I answer yes or no, since i am on L2 (visa valid for next 2 years) and currently have 2 years Employment Authorisation (EAD) where i can work for any employer in the United States ?
I understand that companies ask this question because some of them are not allowed/ do not have a policy to sponsor visas.
I want to know whether i am legally required to say 'yes' beacuse i am on L2 ( since after 2 years, my visa renewal depends on whether or not my spouse's L1 is renewed)
OR
Do I still have a choice to say 'no' since my visa renewal gets done if my husband's gets done or i manage it on my own through a consultant... and the company i will join in both cases does not have to sponsor or pay for my visa either now or in the future.
I do not want to misrepresent any information and get thrown out of the organisation after i join, nor do I want to lose out on opportunities because of answering this question wrongly.
(There is a separate question that asks if i am legally allowed to work in the US and i answer 'yes' to that since i have an EAD)
Let me know please, it'll help a lot.
more...
pictures nicki minaj booty before and
crystal
06-21 08:39 PM
AR-11 form you send to different address . It is not part of I-485.
It is less likely that they compare your addresses with AR-11 address audit logs.
I think you should not worry too much about it.
Though you need to send AR-11 with in 10 days of your move to new address , I guess you can still send AR-11 form ,as AR-11 form does not ask from which date you moved to the new address. Check with your lawyer also
Please help.
It is less likely that they compare your addresses with AR-11 address audit logs.
I think you should not worry too much about it.
Though you need to send AR-11 with in 10 days of your move to new address , I guess you can still send AR-11 form ,as AR-11 form does not ask from which date you moved to the new address. Check with your lawyer also
Please help.
dresses nicki minaj booty before and
amit1234
02-13 08:46 PM
My PD is Jan04 in eb3 catogory and I am from India. Currently I am working under EAD . My wife recently got job offer and her company is ready to file her labor under EB2 category. My question is thats ? will that be a problem when she files for 485 based on her labor since she already filed 485 based on my labor . Any suggestion is appriciated .
more...
makeup dresses 2010 nicki minaj booty
vikasgarg24
03-08 09:50 AM
My friend thats not a Rumour
I personally knows a person who got deported and each and every incidents what happened to him. That happened in Jan-10 but not sure if same thing still continue or not. Because I knows only one incident
I personally knows a person who got deported and each and every incidents what happened to him. That happened in Jan-10 but not sure if same thing still continue or not. Because I knows only one incident
girlfriend nicki minaj booty before and
vaishnavilakshmi
06-20 02:02 AM
Hi,
category-eb3
pd-march2002
i-140-applied on 1st june 2007
i-140 reciept???waiting
IS anyone who has substituted labor(pd2002) and applied for i-140 and recieved the reciepts or approvals for i-140???Please update ur status here..
cheers,
vaishu
category-eb3
pd-march2002
i-140-applied on 1st june 2007
i-140 reciept???waiting
IS anyone who has substituted labor(pd2002) and applied for i-140 and recieved the reciepts or approvals for i-140???Please update ur status here..
cheers,
vaishu
hairstyles house nicki minaj booty before
Ann Ruben
05-26 07:44 AM
Well, that is certainly frustrating! Your best option would be to get in touch with the designated Application Support Center to see if they can either notify the USCIS Service center of the error or have your daughter come in right away for fingerprinting. ASC phone numbers are generally not made public, but in many locations, ASC staff has provided local immigration attorneys with a phone number to use for urgent or unusual situations such as yours.
If you don't have an attorney who can call the ASC for you, you might consider just going to the ASC in person with your daughter to explain the situation and ask for their assistance.
Hope this helps.
Ann
If you don't have an attorney who can call the ASC for you, you might consider just going to the ASC in person with your daughter to explain the situation and ask for their assistance.
Hope this helps.
Ann
Beta_mle
04-18 09:39 AM
Wow, no response. That's discouraging.
Euinox
05-20 01:10 PM
I came to US in 2009 March (on H4 Visa) ,
I filed my H1B in September 2009 with Company A and got approved October 2009. I search for projects 2 months; my employer was unable to place me. So he said he will revoke the H1B petition. After that due to family emergency I gone back to India and while re-entering I entered as H4. (As per I-94 Copy). That H1B never got used and I never got any pay stub from Company A.
Now I am on H4 till date.
I have found the project and the new employer (who is client say Company B) is ready to file my H1B application. Now as per the Company B�s Legal Team, they can�t get the approval before 1st October 2011 (or start date of H1B visa) and they have to fill this position by this month End. (Which is May or Mid June)
Now I have inquired some other place and gone through different forums to get answer.
Here is the query,
If Company B files my H1B petition with attachment of existing I-797, will my petition get approved from the quota of 2009 (since I got visa with validity date as 1st Oct 2009 year)??
What kind of H1B petition I need to file and when it will get approved?
Will this be a fresh H1B petition or something different?
Can I get approval immediately ( if I filed in Premium processing) so I can start working. Or does the petition will say as start date 1st October 2011?
Please help me in this issue. I will really appreciate your help.
Any document/ link which shares light to similar issue is really helpful for me.
I filed my H1B in September 2009 with Company A and got approved October 2009. I search for projects 2 months; my employer was unable to place me. So he said he will revoke the H1B petition. After that due to family emergency I gone back to India and while re-entering I entered as H4. (As per I-94 Copy). That H1B never got used and I never got any pay stub from Company A.
Now I am on H4 till date.
I have found the project and the new employer (who is client say Company B) is ready to file my H1B application. Now as per the Company B�s Legal Team, they can�t get the approval before 1st October 2011 (or start date of H1B visa) and they have to fill this position by this month End. (Which is May or Mid June)
Now I have inquired some other place and gone through different forums to get answer.
Here is the query,
If Company B files my H1B petition with attachment of existing I-797, will my petition get approved from the quota of 2009 (since I got visa with validity date as 1st Oct 2009 year)??
What kind of H1B petition I need to file and when it will get approved?
Will this be a fresh H1B petition or something different?
Can I get approval immediately ( if I filed in Premium processing) so I can start working. Or does the petition will say as start date 1st October 2011?
Please help me in this issue. I will really appreciate your help.
Any document/ link which shares light to similar issue is really helpful for me.