aphotica
03-08 03:59 AM
i want some experience working for a person who would like me to make them various medias from websites to graphics. i mostly create absract art but can also do photo manipulation.
i have standard knowledge in;
Photoshop
3dsmax
& html
Visit my site and contact me via email.
bochap_@hotmail.com
www.aphotica.vze.com
Or see my artworks
www.aphotica.deviantart.com
:phil:
i have standard knowledge in;
Photoshop
3dsmax
& html
Visit my site and contact me via email.
bochap_@hotmail.com
www.aphotica.vze.com
Or see my artworks
www.aphotica.deviantart.com
:phil:
wallpaper celebrity short haircuts
sk017
08-03 11:06 PM
My I-485 is pending with PD of Oct 11 2006(EB2 India). I have been on H1 as was not able to add my spouse to my initial 485 application. As my H1 expires on Sep 6, we recently filed for H1/4 extension and received an RFE for Employee-Employer relationship. We have to answer this by Sep 13. As a Plan B, What we did in June 2010 was
a) I filed for my EAD
b) My spouse got admitted into a school here and applied for COS from H4 to F1 with a valid I-20.
Both of these cases are currently pending.. My questions are:
1) As our H1/4 and I-94 expires on Sep 6, Would we still be in legal status after Sep 6 as both of our cases (EAD and COS) are pending?
2) After answering the RFE, if it is denied, would it impact my GC processing?
3) I understand that even if my H1 is denied, As I have a pending EAD, my status would be okay but what options would we have if my Wife's case is denied.
Thanks in Advance!
a) I filed for my EAD
b) My spouse got admitted into a school here and applied for COS from H4 to F1 with a valid I-20.
Both of these cases are currently pending.. My questions are:
1) As our H1/4 and I-94 expires on Sep 6, Would we still be in legal status after Sep 6 as both of our cases (EAD and COS) are pending?
2) After answering the RFE, if it is denied, would it impact my GC processing?
3) I understand that even if my H1 is denied, As I have a pending EAD, my status would be okay but what options would we have if my Wife's case is denied.
Thanks in Advance!
indyanguy
09-03 12:07 AM
Theoretically, it's possible. However, if there is a Ability 2 Pay issue during 485 adjudication, would you be able to take care of it?
2011 Celebrity Pixie Haircut
rizwan39
09-22 05:49 PM
My company is offering my retention contract for 3 years. As I told them that my GC can take long and I haven't filed for I-485 to use AC-21, I will be in trouble if a loose my job. Based on that they are making a written promose that I will have a same job for the next 3 years with all benifits and the only reason I can loose my job is through a decipline action (bad performance, fight, harrasment, etc).
I want to ask the attorney's and gurus if there is such a contract exist and does it have any value ?
I want to ask the attorney's and gurus if there is such a contract exist and does it have any value ?
more...
mango123
04-16 10:38 AM
How Does USCIS check how long you are with your employer after GC ?
if they check pay checks during Naturalization Interview ?
Any Naturalized members here ,could you post your Interview experience
if they check pay checks during Naturalization Interview ?
Any Naturalized members here ,could you post your Interview experience
tntgirl
02-24 09:35 PM
My sister filed 1-130 for me in 1997. I am currently living in the US on an H1B visa and the I-130 has been approved. As requested by the NVC, my sister submitted her affidavit of support (I-864) and paid the immigrant visa fee. However, I recently found out that I should have filed I-485 instead. I was advised that I cannot file the DS-230 because I live in the US. Is this true? Which could/should I do, DS-230 or I-485? Is there a way to get the immigrant visa fee returned?
I will appreciate any advice.
I will appreciate any advice.
more...
ewiebe
04-08 04:37 AM
Or like in:
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-demo-3d-cube-cd5396f1-df2a-40e3-9310-5d224ecba404
Or like in:
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-automotive-overview-demo-2cff76d1-9142-4720-a991-5cee92078318
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-demo-3d-cube-cd5396f1-df2a-40e3-9310-5d224ecba404
Or like in:
http://www.mentor.com/products/embedded_software/multimedia/overview/inflexion-ui-automotive-overview-demo-2cff76d1-9142-4720-a991-5cee92078318
2010 Black Short Hair Styles
bbct
02-21 01:11 PM
There is a long running thread on this -
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18085
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18085
more...
freddyCR
August 12th, 2005, 03:51 AM
1234http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a103/freddyphoto/MISC/IMG_6516-1BW.jpg
hair Short Blonde Women Hairstyle
Blog Feeds
12-18 09:40 AM
The New York Times today reports on a surgery that is heroic in scope. Japanese-born Tomoaki Kato, a surgeon at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia led a 43-hour operation to remove a massive tumor(the size of a football) that had engulfed the liver and other vital organs of a 59 year old man who had been told the tumor was inoperable. Dr. Kato is a pioneer in ex vivo resections which are surgeries where the affected organs are taken outside the body, operated on to remove tumors and then sewed back in. The surgery seems to have succeeded and this pioneering...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/immigrant-of-the-day-tomoaki-kato-surgeon.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/immigrant-of-the-day-tomoaki-kato-surgeon.html)
more...
speddi
07-11 05:05 PM
Hi,
Here is my situation.
During the july fiasco last year, I applied for I-485 through Company A(I am still working for it). My I-140 is approved. PD : Aug, 2006, EB-2
At the same time, another company (Company B) applied for I-140 through labor substitution(PD: Nov, 2005, EB-2) and it got approved in May this year. I have a receipt notice of that application but no copy of approval notice. I dont intend to join Company B and dont expect any support from them.
Now that PD is June 1, 2006 for EB-2, is there any way I can use the PD of Company B with out the approval notice? If so, can someone point me to the right direction. Thank you.
Here is my situation.
During the july fiasco last year, I applied for I-485 through Company A(I am still working for it). My I-140 is approved. PD : Aug, 2006, EB-2
At the same time, another company (Company B) applied for I-140 through labor substitution(PD: Nov, 2005, EB-2) and it got approved in May this year. I have a receipt notice of that application but no copy of approval notice. I dont intend to join Company B and dont expect any support from them.
Now that PD is June 1, 2006 for EB-2, is there any way I can use the PD of Company B with out the approval notice? If so, can someone point me to the right direction. Thank you.
hot makeup female short hairstyles
Blog Feeds
01-21 08:30 AM
I am a strong supporter of Comprehensive Immigraton Reform (CIR). I have been on both sides of the fence. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, I was an attorney for the Immigration and Naturalization Service. I spent a couple of years representing the government in deportation proceedings, often conducted in Federal prisons. Are there people in the U.S. who should be deported? Absolutely! I have no regrets. But even while serving as an INS Attorney, I fully realized that the man that I deported on Friday afternoon would be back in the U.S., working at his job to feed...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/01/cir-you-cant-always-get-what-you-want-when-you-want-it.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/01/cir-you-cant-always-get-what-you-want-when-you-want-it.html)
more...
house Latest Short Hair Styles 2011
Blog Feeds
08-24 07:00 PM
Every Tuesday, USCIS releases its data on the pace of usage of H-1B numbers. I'm monitoring that usage and projecting the end date for H-1B numbers. It's not complicated science, but I'm basically using a rolling average of the prior four weeks of H-1B usage to minimize the anomolies of one particular week and then assuming that usage over the prior month will continue at roughly the same pace. If usage picks up, the exhaustion date will be revised to be sooner and vice versa if usage declines. We actually saw a decline from prior weeks with 800 H-1B applications...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/h1b-quota-exhaustion-target-still-march-2011.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/08/h1b-quota-exhaustion-target-still-march-2011.html)
tattoo short hair ideas for prom
Dhundhun
06-11 12:49 PM
My attorney is asking $500 for filing both EAD and AP as filing fee. So was wondering how difficult it is to file by my self. Does anyone has expereince filing for renewal.?
You could refer http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18737
You could refer http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18737
more...
pictures Men Hairstyle: Cool Short Hair
Macaca
08-01 08:03 PM
The Speaker In Charge (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/31/AR2007073101628.html?hpid=opinionsbox1) By Harold Meyerson (meyersonh@washpost.com), August 1, 2007
This is one of those odd weeks when Congress may actually work. Both houses are likely to pass Democratic bills to expand SCHIP, the children's health coverage program. Yesterday, the House enacted lobbying reform, and the Senate may follow suit tomorrow. Also yesterday, the House passed a bill restoring the right of victims of pay discrimination to sue their employers.
In short, it's one of those weeks when Nancy Pelosi has no doubts about the wisdom of her decision to become speaker of the House.
"What's it like?" she asked herself, beaming, at the conclusion of a breakfast meeting with roughly 20 liberal journalists yesterday morning.
"It's fabulous! Absolutely fabulous!"
It can't always be thus. Her biggest frustration, of course, is Congress's inability to end the war in Iraq, which she terms "a huge moral catastrophe for the country." It is the public's biggest frustration as well, she says, and the main reason that popular support for Congress has plummeted.
In September, Iraq will once again be Congress's chief item of business, when Gen. David Petraeus delivers his state-of-the-war report.
Pelosi (understandably, given the administration's mountain of misrepresentation on all war-related matters) is wary. "The plural of anecdote is not data," she said. "I'm very concerned they'll pass off anecdotal successes as progress in Iraq."
The question in September will be whether congressional Republicans continue to support President Bush's open-ended commitment to keeping U.S. forces in Iraq while a civil war rages around them. To date, the Republicans' strategy, and not just on the war, has been to thwart the Democrats at every turn and to use the Senate's 60-vote supermajority requirement both to create a "do-nothing" Congress against which they can run and to spare their president from having to veto popular legislation. (Why they care about sparing Bush -- he will never face voters again; they will -- plunges us into the murk of abnormal psychology.)
The GOP strategy is not without its pitfalls. Republicans have succeeded in tanking Congress's approval ratings, but polls consistently show the public, most importantly in swing districts, preferring Democrats to Republicans. With this week's vote on expanding SCHIP, though, Democrats are convinced that the price of blocking health care for uninsured children is more than many Republicans are willing to pay. Bush has vowed to veto the legislation; Pelosi, noting with an almost incredulous glee that the administration will stand athwart children's health care on the grounds of opposing a higher tobacco tax, says, simply, "Welcome to this discussion."
Not all discussions, even in a good week, are so pleasurable to anticipate. Asked about the resolution that her congressional colleague Jay Inslee of Washington has introduced to impeach Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Pelosi put her hands to her temples as if to ward off a headache. For the past year, Pelosi has made clear to her colleagues and the public alike that she has no interest in pursuing the impeachment option, though Gonzales is certainly doing his damnedest to change her mind. She remains unpersuaded, believing that impeachment would fail and in the process would make weeks such as this one -- a week in which the public's business is at last getting done -- far more uncommon than they already are.
Pelosi understands the gravity of the damage that the administration has done to the Constitution and why that has impelled some of her colleagues to advocate impeachment. "If I were not the speaker and I were not in Congress," she said, very quietly, as she concluded her answer, "I would probably be advocating for impeachment." But the consequences she foresees from stopping the nation's business for an unwinnable fight outweighs those considerations.
Pelosi deserves considerable credit for holding her party together on a range of divisive issues, but she plainly views the coming fight among House Democrats on fuel efficiency standards as irrepressible.
The energy bill the House will pass this week contains no provisions that would raise those standards; such provisions, if any, await the outcome of a battle between Pelosi and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell, the Democrat who has represented Detroit and the auto industry in Congress since 1955 (that is, before tailfins).
"I respect all our chairmen," Pelosi said. But the legislation, she continued, isn't about them. "It's about our children's ability to breathe clean air. Nothing less than the planet is at stake. I love him [Dingell] dearly, but we have to prevail. . . . The forces at work here [against stricter standards] are rich and entrenched," she concluded, "and it takes just a few [votes] to prevent us from unleashing the future."
Thus, the most elegant of happy warriors, in a week when it's fun to be speaker.
This is one of those odd weeks when Congress may actually work. Both houses are likely to pass Democratic bills to expand SCHIP, the children's health coverage program. Yesterday, the House enacted lobbying reform, and the Senate may follow suit tomorrow. Also yesterday, the House passed a bill restoring the right of victims of pay discrimination to sue their employers.
In short, it's one of those weeks when Nancy Pelosi has no doubts about the wisdom of her decision to become speaker of the House.
"What's it like?" she asked herself, beaming, at the conclusion of a breakfast meeting with roughly 20 liberal journalists yesterday morning.
"It's fabulous! Absolutely fabulous!"
It can't always be thus. Her biggest frustration, of course, is Congress's inability to end the war in Iraq, which she terms "a huge moral catastrophe for the country." It is the public's biggest frustration as well, she says, and the main reason that popular support for Congress has plummeted.
In September, Iraq will once again be Congress's chief item of business, when Gen. David Petraeus delivers his state-of-the-war report.
Pelosi (understandably, given the administration's mountain of misrepresentation on all war-related matters) is wary. "The plural of anecdote is not data," she said. "I'm very concerned they'll pass off anecdotal successes as progress in Iraq."
The question in September will be whether congressional Republicans continue to support President Bush's open-ended commitment to keeping U.S. forces in Iraq while a civil war rages around them. To date, the Republicans' strategy, and not just on the war, has been to thwart the Democrats at every turn and to use the Senate's 60-vote supermajority requirement both to create a "do-nothing" Congress against which they can run and to spare their president from having to veto popular legislation. (Why they care about sparing Bush -- he will never face voters again; they will -- plunges us into the murk of abnormal psychology.)
The GOP strategy is not without its pitfalls. Republicans have succeeded in tanking Congress's approval ratings, but polls consistently show the public, most importantly in swing districts, preferring Democrats to Republicans. With this week's vote on expanding SCHIP, though, Democrats are convinced that the price of blocking health care for uninsured children is more than many Republicans are willing to pay. Bush has vowed to veto the legislation; Pelosi, noting with an almost incredulous glee that the administration will stand athwart children's health care on the grounds of opposing a higher tobacco tax, says, simply, "Welcome to this discussion."
Not all discussions, even in a good week, are so pleasurable to anticipate. Asked about the resolution that her congressional colleague Jay Inslee of Washington has introduced to impeach Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Pelosi put her hands to her temples as if to ward off a headache. For the past year, Pelosi has made clear to her colleagues and the public alike that she has no interest in pursuing the impeachment option, though Gonzales is certainly doing his damnedest to change her mind. She remains unpersuaded, believing that impeachment would fail and in the process would make weeks such as this one -- a week in which the public's business is at last getting done -- far more uncommon than they already are.
Pelosi understands the gravity of the damage that the administration has done to the Constitution and why that has impelled some of her colleagues to advocate impeachment. "If I were not the speaker and I were not in Congress," she said, very quietly, as she concluded her answer, "I would probably be advocating for impeachment." But the consequences she foresees from stopping the nation's business for an unwinnable fight outweighs those considerations.
Pelosi deserves considerable credit for holding her party together on a range of divisive issues, but she plainly views the coming fight among House Democrats on fuel efficiency standards as irrepressible.
The energy bill the House will pass this week contains no provisions that would raise those standards; such provisions, if any, await the outcome of a battle between Pelosi and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell, the Democrat who has represented Detroit and the auto industry in Congress since 1955 (that is, before tailfins).
"I respect all our chairmen," Pelosi said. But the legislation, she continued, isn't about them. "It's about our children's ability to breathe clean air. Nothing less than the planet is at stake. I love him [Dingell] dearly, but we have to prevail. . . . The forces at work here [against stricter standards] are rich and entrenched," she concluded, "and it takes just a few [votes] to prevent us from unleashing the future."
Thus, the most elegant of happy warriors, in a week when it's fun to be speaker.
dresses Black Hairstyles Short Hair.
div_bell_2003
07-07 06:40 PM
You are only counted against the quota once for a 6 year period , so I believe, she won't come under the quota , although it's getting harder to get H1B extensions every day
more...
makeup wedding tiara hairstyles.
vban2007
04-23 10:35 AM
H4-H1-EAD-AP
Hi All,
Would request any answers or any practical experiences in regards to my queries:
My wife and my infant daughter originally came to the US in 2004 on H4 and my wife got her H1-B also in 2004.
In Oct 2007 I and my wife got our EAD (The GC processing is through my company). Also since our arrival to the US in 2004 we did not go to India . But we are planning to go this summer.
My queries: We are planning to use AP to enter US
*
What will be my status once I come back from India. Can I maintain H1B Status without going for stamping since I changed my company. to enter US
*
My wife has no H1-B stamp on her passport (since she came on h4). Can she come back on H1B, without going for stamping? Or is it advisable to go for stamping of her H1 and come on H1-B?
*
My daughter has H4 visa based on my H1-B, can she come on H4?
Appreciate your response.
__________________
Hi All,
Would request any answers or any practical experiences in regards to my queries:
My wife and my infant daughter originally came to the US in 2004 on H4 and my wife got her H1-B also in 2004.
In Oct 2007 I and my wife got our EAD (The GC processing is through my company). Also since our arrival to the US in 2004 we did not go to India . But we are planning to go this summer.
My queries: We are planning to use AP to enter US
*
What will be my status once I come back from India. Can I maintain H1B Status without going for stamping since I changed my company. to enter US
*
My wife has no H1-B stamp on her passport (since she came on h4). Can she come back on H1B, without going for stamping? Or is it advisable to go for stamping of her H1 and come on H1-B?
*
My daughter has H4 visa based on my H1-B, can she come on H4?
Appreciate your response.
__________________
girlfriend emo hairstyles for short hair
vankadar
07-09 01:30 PM
Hi,
I got conflicting answers for this questions so I thought it would be best to post my question here.
This is the scenario
Company A
I am filing green card with this company based on **FUTURE EMPLOYMENT**
LABOUR APPROVED,I-140 PENDING,PRIORITY DATE : JAN 2009
Company B (Present Employer)
Labor Approved (Priority date : Aug 2009)
Now the question is Can I NOW file 140 with company B before my company A I-140 gets approved...?
In this case will I be able to use my Jan2009 priority date after my pending company-A I-140 gets approved..??
Note: I wanted to file 485 ONLY WITH COMPANY B
Again to summarize, Before my 1st 140 (Company A) gets approved can i apply for 2nd 140 (from company B)and still use 1st company's priority date when filing for 485 with 2nd company (Company B)
I got conflicting answers for this questions so I thought it would be best to post my question here.
This is the scenario
Company A
I am filing green card with this company based on **FUTURE EMPLOYMENT**
LABOUR APPROVED,I-140 PENDING,PRIORITY DATE : JAN 2009
Company B (Present Employer)
Labor Approved (Priority date : Aug 2009)
Now the question is Can I NOW file 140 with company B before my company A I-140 gets approved...?
In this case will I be able to use my Jan2009 priority date after my pending company-A I-140 gets approved..??
Note: I wanted to file 485 ONLY WITH COMPANY B
Again to summarize, Before my 1st 140 (Company A) gets approved can i apply for 2nd 140 (from company B)and still use 1st company's priority date when filing for 485 with 2nd company (Company B)
hairstyles Choppy Layered Short Hair
GCMATRIX
09-13 04:38 PM
Hello
Please can any body tell me whether there is any mandatory period or rule to stay with your employer after getting GC . When person can leave an employer after getting GC. Experts your comments are valuable for me
Thank you in advance
Please can any body tell me whether there is any mandatory period or rule to stay with your employer after getting GC . When person can leave an employer after getting GC. Experts your comments are valuable for me
Thank you in advance
Blog Feeds
01-20 08:10 AM
The National Foundation for American Policy has released a policy brief regarding the new GAO report on the H-1B program and notes that the GAO blows a torpedo through the common complaint that the H-1B program is just a way to bring in cheap guest workers. NFAP GAO H-1B report
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/nfap-gao-report-confirms-h-1b-workers-paid-as-much-as-comparable-americans.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/nfap-gao-report-confirms-h-1b-workers-paid-as-much-as-comparable-americans.html)
Karthikthiru
06-10 04:43 PM
Interesting
Karthik
Karthik