calabor2001
03-27 09:42 PM
My application was filed in EB3 category and PD is current (has been since start of this year). I have an approved I-140 since Feb 07 and the I-485 was filed prior to the mess of 2007. I have taken 4 Infopass appointments trying to find out why is it taking this long to get "a decision". At this point, I don't care what the decision is, as long as there is one so that I can move on in my life. Called and spoke with the processing center that the case is outside their "normal processing time" only to hear, "We are processing". They won't tell me what is going on.
Wondering about my options here? Congressional inquiry? Writ of Mandamus? Anything? Anyone in the same position as me?
Wondering about my options here? Congressional inquiry? Writ of Mandamus? Anything? Anyone in the same position as me?
wallpaper Layered Hairstyles 2008.
varinder
06-07 02:09 PM
Thank you so much.
BrickWall
03-13 01:19 PM
I know many friends of mine, who has done B.E and MS from diferent background (like Mechanical, Electronics etc) and were still able to get the LC approved from a software company since they were working there. There should not be any issue with it.
2011 fall 2008 hairstyles pictures
Blog Feeds
09-24 03:20 AM
South Korean-born Dr. Jim Yong Kim today assumes the presidency of Dartmouth College and becomes the first Asian American to lead an Ivy League university. The physician, teacher and infectious disease expert told the Dartmouth community: It is �deeply humbling for me � the child of Korean immigrants from a small town in Iowa� to follow in the footsteps of his predecessors and lead Dartmouth College. Here is a clip from today's inauguration:
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/immigrant-of-the-day-jim-yong-kim-university-president.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/09/immigrant-of-the-day-jim-yong-kim-university-president.html)
more...
SpookyH1Alien
05-20 04:02 PM
I am very sorry to hear about your situation. Yes, you can bring your sister here on a visitor's visa to stay with you but she has to go back in 6 months.
sachin_216
11-02 09:57 AM
Check this site...
How to record departure from the United States after the fact (http://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/752/kw/I%20forgot%20to%20turn%20in%20my%20I-94)
How to record departure from the United States after the fact (http://help.cbp.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/752/kw/I%20forgot%20to%20turn%20in%20my%20I-94)
more...
saty2010
05-06 06:53 PM
Hi
I am working on H1B from Oct 2009. My employer and client has one layer between of them. For some family reason I need to visit India for 10 days. Will it cause any problem / Issue on airport (immigration counter) when I will come back to USA ?
In this case how can I prepare myself to face situation? What documents do I need to prepare to prove that even though I am working with one layer then also my employer control my salary and tax stuffs ?
Waiting for reply, please help...!!!
Thank You
I am working on H1B from Oct 2009. My employer and client has one layer between of them. For some family reason I need to visit India for 10 days. Will it cause any problem / Issue on airport (immigration counter) when I will come back to USA ?
In this case how can I prepare myself to face situation? What documents do I need to prepare to prove that even though I am working with one layer then also my employer control my salary and tax stuffs ?
Waiting for reply, please help...!!!
Thank You
2010 hairstyles from 2008
ivp33
05-30 05:56 PM
Hello forum participants.
I am a dependent on an I-485 application, with my father being the primary applicant. The application has been pending since 2001, so I decided to first threaten USCIS with a lawsuit, and then maybe file a writ of mandamus. My question is whether I have authority to do so as a dependent. Can I represent the whole family or at least myself? My father is leaving the country for some time and it will be hard for him to participate in the process.
Thanks!
I am a dependent on an I-485 application, with my father being the primary applicant. The application has been pending since 2001, so I decided to first threaten USCIS with a lawsuit, and then maybe file a writ of mandamus. My question is whether I have authority to do so as a dependent. Can I represent the whole family or at least myself? My father is leaving the country for some time and it will be hard for him to participate in the process.
Thanks!
more...
badluck
07-20 10:37 AM
vv
hair short funky hairstyles 2008
gnutin
05-04 11:37 AM
No, you only pay the visa application fees. India has a visa agreement with US so issuance fee is no longer required. You should check the US consulate website for more details.
more...
saveimmigration
05-08 12:54 PM
visa bulletin is already out
EB2 India - 01JAN00
EB2 India - 01JAN00
hot updo hairstyles 2008.
Macaca
10-30 08:54 PM
Honey, They Shrunk the Congress (http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/30/opinion/30tues4.html) By ADAM COHEN | New York Times, October 30, 2007
President Bush�s nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, was asked an important question about Congress�s power at his confirmation hearing. If witnesses claim executive privilege and refuse to respond to Congressional subpoenas in the United States attorneys scandal � as Karl Rove and Harriet Miers have done � and Congress holds them in contempt, would his Justice Department refer the matter to a grand jury for criminal prosecution, as federal law requires?
Mr. Mukasey suggested the answer would be no. That was hardly his only slap-down of Congress. He made the startling claim that a president can defy laws if he or she is acting within the authority �to defend the country.� That is a mighty large exception to the rule that Congress�s laws are supreme.
The founders wanted the �people�s branch� to be strong, but the Bush administration has usurped a frightening number of Congress�s powers � with very little resistance. The question is whether members of Congress of both parties will do anything about it.
Congress is often described as one of three coequal branches, but that is not entirely true. As Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale law professor, observed in �America�s Constitution: a Biography,� Article I actually makes Congress �first among equals, with wide power to structure the second-mentioned executive and third-mentioned judicial branches.�
Article I, which describes Congress�s powers, is the Constitution�s first, longest and most generously worded article. It gives Congress a wide array of specific powers, but also broad authority to pass laws that bring to life �all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.�
It would be hard to recognize that powerful Congress today. In part, that is because Congress has been unwilling or unable to enact laws on the most important issues facing the nation � Iraq, immigration reform, health care.
Just as troubling, though, is how it has allowed its institutional power to erode. President Bush has regularly issued signing statements � including on critical issues like the ban on torture � that assert his right to ignore new laws at the same time as he signs them. These signing statements are not just talk. A report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office states that in nearly one-third of the cases it looked at, after President Bush issued a signing statement objecting to a provision of a new law, his administration did not implement it as written.
The Senate has routinely confirmed judicial nominees who make no secret of their belief that the president�s power should be sweeping, and Congress�s sharply cut back.
The Senate confirmed Jeffrey Sutton to a federal appeals court judgeship even though Patrick Leahy, now the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, observed that as a lawyer Mr. Sutton �aggressively sought out cases to limit the power of Congress to enact laws protecting individual rights.� It confirmed Janice Rogers Brown to the powerful United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit even though she had suggested that much of the legislation passed during the New Deal � including the Social Security Act � was unconstitutional.
There are things Congress can do. It can start by speaking out about the importance of Congressional power the way the administration has talked about deferring to the commander in chief. Congress should pass laws that support its own power � like a bipartisan one that Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, has introduced to nullify the impact of signing statements.
The Senate should refuse to confirm nominees who do not take Congressional power seriously. And Congress should make clear that if the executive branch will not enforce its subpoenas, it will use its own �inherent contempt� powers to do so.
Right now, standing up for Congress may appeal more to Democrats than Republicans. The issue of reining in presidential power is beginning to gain traction among conservatives, however, as they contemplate the possibility of a Democrat � particularly Hillary Clinton � as president.
Defending Congressional authority should not be a partisan issue. The founders wanted a strong Congress because they understood the importance of ensuring that the most democratic branch have a strong say in how the nation is run.
President Bush�s nominee for attorney general, Michael Mukasey, was asked an important question about Congress�s power at his confirmation hearing. If witnesses claim executive privilege and refuse to respond to Congressional subpoenas in the United States attorneys scandal � as Karl Rove and Harriet Miers have done � and Congress holds them in contempt, would his Justice Department refer the matter to a grand jury for criminal prosecution, as federal law requires?
Mr. Mukasey suggested the answer would be no. That was hardly his only slap-down of Congress. He made the startling claim that a president can defy laws if he or she is acting within the authority �to defend the country.� That is a mighty large exception to the rule that Congress�s laws are supreme.
The founders wanted the �people�s branch� to be strong, but the Bush administration has usurped a frightening number of Congress�s powers � with very little resistance. The question is whether members of Congress of both parties will do anything about it.
Congress is often described as one of three coequal branches, but that is not entirely true. As Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale law professor, observed in �America�s Constitution: a Biography,� Article I actually makes Congress �first among equals, with wide power to structure the second-mentioned executive and third-mentioned judicial branches.�
Article I, which describes Congress�s powers, is the Constitution�s first, longest and most generously worded article. It gives Congress a wide array of specific powers, but also broad authority to pass laws that bring to life �all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.�
It would be hard to recognize that powerful Congress today. In part, that is because Congress has been unwilling or unable to enact laws on the most important issues facing the nation � Iraq, immigration reform, health care.
Just as troubling, though, is how it has allowed its institutional power to erode. President Bush has regularly issued signing statements � including on critical issues like the ban on torture � that assert his right to ignore new laws at the same time as he signs them. These signing statements are not just talk. A report by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office states that in nearly one-third of the cases it looked at, after President Bush issued a signing statement objecting to a provision of a new law, his administration did not implement it as written.
The Senate has routinely confirmed judicial nominees who make no secret of their belief that the president�s power should be sweeping, and Congress�s sharply cut back.
The Senate confirmed Jeffrey Sutton to a federal appeals court judgeship even though Patrick Leahy, now the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman, observed that as a lawyer Mr. Sutton �aggressively sought out cases to limit the power of Congress to enact laws protecting individual rights.� It confirmed Janice Rogers Brown to the powerful United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit even though she had suggested that much of the legislation passed during the New Deal � including the Social Security Act � was unconstitutional.
There are things Congress can do. It can start by speaking out about the importance of Congressional power the way the administration has talked about deferring to the commander in chief. Congress should pass laws that support its own power � like a bipartisan one that Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, has introduced to nullify the impact of signing statements.
The Senate should refuse to confirm nominees who do not take Congressional power seriously. And Congress should make clear that if the executive branch will not enforce its subpoenas, it will use its own �inherent contempt� powers to do so.
Right now, standing up for Congress may appeal more to Democrats than Republicans. The issue of reining in presidential power is beginning to gain traction among conservatives, however, as they contemplate the possibility of a Democrat � particularly Hillary Clinton � as president.
Defending Congressional authority should not be a partisan issue. The founders wanted a strong Congress because they understood the importance of ensuring that the most democratic branch have a strong say in how the nation is run.
more...
house View our hair gallery for the latest collection of hot styles for 2008 and
Brad56
08-04 02:10 AM
I have bachelors degree in law and 7 years human resource training development manager. Could I apply for eb2?
tattoo 2008 wedding updo hairstyles
paritp
03-25 10:41 AM
please delete this...i guess its in the wrong forum......
more...
pictures wedding hairstyles 2008
gcpool
03-22 07:00 AM
You just need your approved EB3 I-140 notice
dresses short fall hairstyles 2008
SlowRoasted
05-01 10:12 PM
oooo cool, i like the effect on the dog image too.
more...
makeup bang hairstyles 2008. asian
Blog Feeds
07-10 12:10 PM
General Motors emerged from bankruptcy today and promises it is the beginning of a new age for America's leading car manufacturer. Canadian-born Ray Young, the child of Chinese immigrants, is one of the folks leading GM to what will hopefully be a return to profitability. Young was interviewed by CNBC this morning and rightfully noted that every product GM launches must be a winner if the company is going to succeed. Young also indicated that GM is planning on having an initial public offering of new shares in the next few months in order to repay loans to taxpayers. GM...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/immigrant-of-the-day-ray-young-gm-cfo.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/07/immigrant-of-the-day-ray-young-gm-cfo.html)
girlfriend updo hairstyles 2008.
Pagal
02-13 02:43 PM
Hello,
Your SSN is used mainly for employment and taxation purposes. You can go to India and come back without any issue ... the SSN will wait for you in your mailbox... :)
Your SSN is used mainly for employment and taxation purposes. You can go to India and come back without any issue ... the SSN will wait for you in your mailbox... :)
hairstyles Emo hairstyles 2008 pictures
vedicman
04-27 03:31 PM
Hey guys, I am planning on getting my in-laws this summer or early fall. What are the papers I need to be sending? Thanks for your advice in advance.
aadimanav
08-19 04:54 PM
Hi Everyone,
Just curous - if anyone has experience of filling W8-BEN form. Our bank has sent a letter addressed to my wife requiring her to fill that form.
Does anyone know we have to fill this form?
Aren't we "RESIDENT" fom IRS point of view.
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.
THanks,
Just curous - if anyone has experience of filling W8-BEN form. Our bank has sent a letter addressed to my wife requiring her to fill that form.
Does anyone know we have to fill this form?
Aren't we "RESIDENT" fom IRS point of view.
Thanks in advance for sharing your experience.
THanks,
need_info
03-11 06:41 AM
Hi,
I hold a H1B Visa from Company A, which is valid until Sep 2010. I have not used this Visa since the stamping is done.
I am working in India from an X Company and because of the recession and bad job market at US, I did not make use of my H1B Visa.
But now my Employer (Company A) has an in-house project in US. So, I am planning to enter US on my H1B Visa now.
1) What documentation is required to show at the Port of Entry?
2) Since my Visa is going to expire by Sept 2010, which is just 6 months validity, will there be any issues / queries at the Port of Entry.
I hold a H1B Visa from Company A, which is valid until Sep 2010. I have not used this Visa since the stamping is done.
I am working in India from an X Company and because of the recession and bad job market at US, I did not make use of my H1B Visa.
But now my Employer (Company A) has an in-house project in US. So, I am planning to enter US on my H1B Visa now.
1) What documentation is required to show at the Port of Entry?
2) Since my Visa is going to expire by Sept 2010, which is just 6 months validity, will there be any issues / queries at the Port of Entry.